Suggest a correction
Make the report easy to verify
Include the site page, the exact statement or section, and why you think it needs a correction. If a package name is involved, describe the written label and food form without including personal information. A disagreement about a traditional classification is more useful when it names the competing source rather than simply calling one answer wrong.
A useful example is: “On /ingredients/ginger, the storage paragraph describes a whole root, but this sentence appears to apply it to a cut piece. Please compare the linked source’s distinction.” This is an example of a report format, not a claim that the current ginger page contains that error.
Choose a source and keep personal details out
An optional source should link to the relevant original publication or institutional page, not just a search-results page. Explain which passage supports your point. You can report a broken link or unclear wording even without a replacement source; label it as that kind of issue rather than asserting an unverified medical conclusion.
The form is not a place for symptoms, prescriptions, medical documents or contact details. It cannot provide a diagnosis or a private consultation. The page path, report text and optional URL are stored for editorial review; submitting a URL does not cause the server to fetch or validate its contents automatically.
After submission
When accepted, the form displays a reference for the report. Keep that reference if you need to identify the submission later. An editor can review the queue and mark a report resolved. The reference confirms receipt, not an immediate reply, a medical assessment or acceptance of every proposed wording.
If submission fails, read the error and retry later, or use Copy report to retain the text locally. Avoid sending the same report repeatedly. If clipboard permission is unavailable, select and copy your draft manually before leaving the page.